Your Mood Pattern

Your personal trigger map, built from daily check-ins

42%

worse mood days

Over the past ten days, a pattern has emerged from your logs: certain combinations of sleep, caffeine, and workload consistently precede your lowest moods. By quantifying these correlations, the tracker reveals which factors matter most — and which ones you can adjust.

The data tells a quiet story. On days when sleep dipped below six hours, your average mood score fell to 3.2 — a full 4.1 points below your baseline of 7.3 on well-rested days. The effect compounds: when you also consumed more than three cups of caffeine that same morning, the drop deepened to 5.8 points below baseline.

Social time emerged as a surprising buffer. Even on high-workload days (rated 8 or above), spending at least one hour with friends or family lifted your mood by an average of 2.4 points. But on the three days where social time was zero — May 15, 18, and 21 — your mood never broke above 5, and twice hit 2 or 3.

Perhaps the starkest signal came from workload itself. The correlation coefficient between workload and mood was -0.81, making it the single strongest predictor in your dataset. When workload hit 9 or 10, your sleep also suffered — those nights averaged 4.5 hours, creating a feedback loop that took two days to break.

By Friday, May 16, you logged 8.5 hours of sleep, one cup of caffeine, and four hours of social time. Your mood hit 9 — a near-perfect day. The contrast with Wednesday, May 14, is instructive: similar workload (6 vs. 5), but sleep was 7 hours and caffeine was 3 cups. Your mood was 6, not terrible, but noticeably lower. The data suggests that even modest changes in sleep and caffeine create measurable differences in how you feel.

Your Week at a Glance

05-12
7productive, calm
05-13
4stressed, tired
05-14
6okay, focused
05-15
3anxious, burnout
05-16
8happy, energetic
05-17
5meh, tired
05-18
2depressed, exhausted
05-19
9great, social
05-20
6productive, calm
05-21
4stressed, tired

Your Triggers — Ranked by Impact

Correlation coefficients range from -1 (strong negative) to +1 (strong positive). Click any row to see the data behind it.

Based on 10 daily entries from May 12–21, 2025. Correlations are computed using Pearson’s r. Sample size is small — these are directional insights, not clinical conclusions.

Based on the approach described in this article. Data is simulated for demonstration.